Page 3 of 3

Re: ISSF Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 6:15 am
by David Levene
TenMetrePeter wrote:With white background and the traditional sub six aiming what could be better than black, even Carbide flame soot black (these lighters are still available from Germany!)

How would a lighter colour help here?
Some people say they find coloured sights easier on the Rapid target. (I always preferred black)

Re: ISSF Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:47 pm
by IPshooter
TenMetrePeter wrote:
IPshooter wrote:If this rule, as currently drafted, prohibits anything other than completely black sights, I really hope that someone will come to their senses at the ISSF.

.....

Stan
With white background and the traditional sub six aiming what could be better than black, even Carbide flame soot black (these lighters are still available from Germany!)

How would a lighter colour help here?
Pistol_sight_picture.png
That sight picture doesn't work on the RF target.

Re: ISSF Rules

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 1:37 am
by Spencer
David Levene wrote:
TenMetrePeter wrote:With white background and the traditional sub six aiming what could be better than black, even Carbide flame soot black (these lighters are still available from Germany!)

How would a lighter colour help here?
Some people say they find coloured sights easier on the Rapid target. (I always preferred black)
Me too for both paper and EST; provided it is an ISSF compliant 25m range (6.4.1.5).
For outdoors (service style events), I found a coloured front sight was an advantage.

Re: ISSF Rules

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:22 am
by TenMetrePeter
David Levene wrote:
TenMetrePeter wrote:With white background and the traditional sub six aiming what could be better than black, even Carbide flame soot black (these lighters are still available from Germany!)

How would a lighter colour help here?
Some people say they find coloured sights easier on the Rapid target. (I always preferred black)
Hmm, not for much longer then.
I predict rapid fire will be next on the list for removal from Olympics. In EU the Commission's push towards removing any lethal weapon capable of rapid fire from legal public ownership (crooks and terrorists can still have them of course) does not bode well for RF.

Re: ISSF Rules

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 8:03 am
by jhmartin
TenMetrePeter wrote: I predict rapid fire will be next on the list for removal from Olympics. In EU the Commission's push towards removing any lethal weapon capable of rapid fire from legal public ownership (crooks and terrorists can still have them of course) does not bode well for RF.
Interesting .... include the SGs for Skeet & Trap?

Re: ISSF Rules

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:38 am
by TenMetrePeter
jhmartin wrote:
TenMetrePeter wrote: I predict rapid fire will be next on the list for removal from Olympics. In EU the Commission's push towards removing any lethal weapon capable of rapid fire from legal public ownership (crooks and terrorists can still have them of course) does not bode well for RF.
Interesting .... include the SGs for Skeet & Trap?
Nah. shotguns supported by wealthy land owners. Gentleman's weapon.