Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true

Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H

Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
Elmas
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: 11264 Egypt

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by Elmas »

TenMetrePeter wrote:So given the box restriction and the need to maximise moment of inertia we seem to need a lightish pistol with the grip at the back and weight shifted toward the muzzle.
In fact a bit like every top end pistol out there?
Seems like so !

This is a situation where you are not allowed to 'think outside the box" .
User avatar
ShootingSight
Posts: 318
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 9:37 pm
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Contact:

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by ShootingSight »

Another solution would be to put the grip right under the muzzle (ignore how the trigger linkage would work - just for the sake of argument), so the barrel projects back over your forearm. That would similarly create a large polar moment, but it would move the CG closer to your shoulder, which would allow you to hold it up more easily.

Now the barrel weight would create a torque tipping your wrist up, instead of down. Dunno the ergonomic impact of that one.

You'd also have to think about the sights - being closer to your eye would present focus issues.

Interesting discussion! It opens up why we do things the way we do.
Art Neergaard
ShootingSight LLC
www.shootingsight.com
info@shootingsight.com
513-702-4879
TenMetrePeter
Posts: 603
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 10:59 am

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by TenMetrePeter »

" so the barrel projects back over your forearm."
CTu4_ZCUwAA4zWo.jpg
Last edited by TenMetrePeter on Fri Jul 07, 2017 11:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
william
Posts: 1467
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:31 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by william »

"...put the grip right under the muzzle (ignore how the trigger linkage would work - just for the sake of argument), so the barrel projects back over your forearm."

It's called a bullpup. After you've sorted out the trigger (electric can do that) you can decide what to do about the cylinder. Either it makes prohibited contact with the wrist / forearm, or it puts the bore axis & sights so far above the hand as to introduce a whole new set of problems. If Cesare hasn't come up with a way to do it it probably isn't worth doing, at least with the rule book currently in force.
Chia
Posts: 359
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:53 am

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by Chia »

As a reminder for you proponents of bullpup designs, don't forget Rule 8.4.1.1.a
Neither the grip nor any part of the pistol may be extended or constructed in
any way that would allow it to touch beyond the hand. The wrist must remain
visibly free when the pistol is held in the normal firing position.
Most bullpup firearms are designed to rest against the trigger arm...that would be a definite "no-go" under the ISSF rules.
Europa
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:26 am

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by Europa »

The points made by J-team are difficult to ignore ["A lighter pistol is more effected by triggering errors (and yes, even the best in the world make slight errors occasionally with the trigger technique), weight has a dampening effect"].

I've owned a LP400 carbon for two and a half years. Wanted a lighter pistol because it's always easier to increase and redistribute extra weight when required. At 900g, it seemed easier to shoot well; but mistakes were severely punished. Consequently, I've added the pair of muzzle weights, wrapped 47g of thin sheet lead around the barrel (under the carbon jacket); hollowed-out the grip a wee bit and added some lead there as well. Current weight is 1030 with a full cylinder. Still not a heavy AP, and I'm not convinced it needs to be any heavier for me.
User avatar
ShootingSight
Posts: 318
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 9:37 pm
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Contact:

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by ShootingSight »

Gyroscopic stabilization!
Art Neergaard
ShootingSight LLC
www.shootingsight.com
info@shootingsight.com
513-702-4879
David Levene
Posts: 5618
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by David Levene »

ShootingSight wrote:Gyroscopic stabilization!
Rule 8.4.1.6
Movement or Oscillation Reduction Systems. Any device, mechanism or system that actively reduces, slows or minimizes pistol oscillations or movements before the shot is released is prohibited.
Rover
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Idaho panhandle

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by Rover »

Damn, David, you're just no fun!
David Levene
Posts: 5618
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by David Levene »

Someone's got to (try to) keep you lot in line.
Elmas
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: 11264 Egypt

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by Elmas »

David Levene wrote:Someone's got to (try to) keep you lot in line.


You mean put a damper on creativity ?


Elmas
User avatar
j-team
Posts: 1372
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:48 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by j-team »

Elmas wrote:
David Levene wrote:Someone's got to (try to) keep you lot in line.


You mean put a damper on creativity ?


Elmas
Within the rules = Creativity

Outside the rules = Cheating
User avatar
deadeyedick
Posts: 1177
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by deadeyedick »

Any device, mechanism or system that actively reduces, slows or minimizes pistol oscillations or movements before the shot is released is prohibited.
This is partly tongue in cheek David, but has anyone ever suggested that barrel weights could fit into that category? I it seems to be universally accepted that weights have a reducing, slowing or minimising effect on pistol movement.
David Levene
Posts: 5618
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by David Levene »

deadeyedick wrote:
Any device, mechanism or system that actively reduces, slows or minimizes pistol oscillations or movements before the shot is released is prohibited.
This is partly tongue in cheek David, but has anyone ever suggested that barrel weights could fit into that category? I it seems to be universally accepted that weights have a reducing, slowing or minimising effect on pistol movement.
I've never heard of it. Surely barrel weights are passive. If all else fails, what's the spirit and intent of the rule?
Gwhite
Posts: 3187
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Lighter Air Pistols - The Wave Of The Future?

Post by Gwhite »

I think the key word is "actively". If it just sits there, it's OK.

I've actually help test a prototype gyro stabilizer for military sniper rifles. I was shooting standing, and it cut my wobble about 50%. It tended to argue with you if you had to change your aiming point, but once you settled, it was quite effective.
Post Reply